European Spanish vs American Spanish: How Different Are they?

79

By Víctor Manteiga

Spanish in the world: where it is official and where it is studied as a second language. Source, Wikipedia.
See all 2 photos
Spanish in the world: where it is official and where it is studied as a second language. Source, Wikipedia.

Spanish is a very old language, dating back to the last centuries of the first millennium AD. Though it is not easy to put a date to the birth of a language and it often takes a good deal of arbitrariness to do so, we could say that by the end of the seventh century AD, Latin in the Iberian Peninsula had already turned into something else.

Rafael Lapesa, in his classic reference book Historia de la Lengua Española1, states the following

The Romance language spoken in Spain at the end of the Visigothic period was in an incipient state of formation, and still showed very primitive characteristics. (127; my translation)

It was not quite the same language we call Spanish today, yet it was not Latin anymore. It was its first stage of development, and that would make Spanish as old as 1300 years old! Such a long period of time is enough for almost anything to evolve and change considerably.

Indeed, modern Spanish is very different to what it was back then, and it has had the time to derive into very different versions of itself. Linguists call such versions dialects2. The older the language, the more dialects it is likely to have.

Sometimes those dialects are so different from each other that they change into something completely different. Then, the term dialect does not apply anymore and linguists start talking about different languages. That was what happened to Latin: the different dialects spoken throughout the Roman Empire derived into the modern Romance languages, such as Spanish, Catalan, French, Italian or Portuguese.

When does a dialect become a language? Nothing more difficult to know. Linguists have not agreed yet, and a great deal of subjective opinion can be involved when establishing the distinction sometimes. The criteria are very diverse and fuzzy, and mutual understandability is not really an agreed upon criterion as one might think in the first place.

An example: a few years ago, I had to spend a night in a very cheap hostel in London. I was very excited about a job interview I was having the following morning and I could not sleep, so I spent hours chatting with Ricardo, an Italian guy I had to share the room with. Ricardo did not speak a word of English, yet we spoke about plenty of different things, such as girls, globalization, cinema, and any other random topics you could imagine. I spoke Spanish to him, and he spoke Italian to me. Did we understand each other? We did indeed! Yet, Spanish and Italian are not considered to be dialects, but two whole different languages.

So, how about European Spanish and American Spanish? Are they two dialects of the same language (Spanish), or are they two completely different languages? This question would never be asked in the Spanish speaking world, since nobody there would ever even think of them as two different languages at all. The same applies to the English speaking world: no one in London or Liverpool would have any problems acknowledging the fact that he or she speaks the same language as Madonna, Barack Obama or any other USA citizen, i.e. the English language. Besides, the question would not be a valid one anyway on the grounds that it makes the issue far too simplistic: there is not just one European Spanish dialect and there is not just one American Spanish dialect.

An important fact comes to mind: Spanish is one of the most widely spoken languages in the world as for the number of native speakers is concerned. There are more than 6,000 languages, and Spanish is second only to Chinese. According to SIL's Ethnologue3 -arguably the most comprehensive linguistic atlas ever published-, the statistics for the 5 most widely spoken languages go like this:

List of  5 most spoken languages according to SIL's Ethnologue
List of 5 most spoken languages according to SIL's Ethnologue
A Brief History of the Spanish Language
Amazon Price: $21.87
List Price: $30.00
A History of the Spanish Language
Amazon Price: $113.56
List Price: $135.00
A History of the Spanish Language through Texts
Amazon Price: $119.31
List Price: $135.00

A language spoken by so many people in so many countries throughout so many centuries will inevitably be the sum of many versions of itself. When Spaniards landed on American shores, they took their language from Europe to America not as a homogeneous entity, but as a collage of accentual and lexical variation. At the same time, native Americans there spoke many languages, each of them a mosaic of dialect variety themselves.

When we say European Spanish, we mean an abstraction of the different varieties of Madrid, Seville, Majorca, Gran Canaria, Valladolid, Bilbao and all the many other regions of Spain where Spanish is spoken. American Spanish is, in its turn, a reductionist way of addressing a complex reality, that of the different dialects spoken in Colombia, Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Uruguay, USA, and so on. This complexity cannot be neglected if we want to make valid comparisons, since many linguistic characteristics are shared by many of the varieties and not others, and they overlap very frequently.

So, European Spanish and American Spanish: how different are they? Well, it depends. They are never so different as to have great problems understanding one another, and official institutions such as La Real Academia Española work hard to make the whole Spanish speaking world never be too far apart as to let another great Romance language change happen. Some words are genuinely American, such as guagua, and boludo, but most people will understand them in Spain -and in some regions even use them-, and vice versa. Spanish is a rich varied language, and addressing differences will have to be done attending to more accurate regional and social criteria.


* You will find this hub translated into Spanish on my website soon, www.vmtranslator.com.

References

1Lapesa, Rafael, 1981. Historia de la Lengua Española, Eleventh edition. Madrid, Spain: Gredos

2Chambers, J.K. & Peter Trudgill, 1998. Dialectology, Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

3 Lewes, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International

Comments

Martín 19 months ago

A really well-developed and interesting article dude. Congrats.

Greetings from Argentina.

InParis profile image

InParis 16 months ago

Hi Victor

Very good article; I read it because I have really been wondering about this. This was a very good explanation. Thanks

DTR0005 profile image

DTR0005 16 months ago

Nice article, and this isn't the first time I have heard a Spanish speaker say they could understand Italian and vice versa. This reminds me of the debate over Danish and Norwegian. Most linguists define them as being mere dialects of each other while the Norwegians and the Danes, even though they can understand each other, tend to insist that they are indeed separate languages. It may come down to more of a question of national identity than anything else. Nice piece.

Víctor Manteiga profile image

Víctor Manteiga Hub Author 16 months ago

InParis: Thanks for commenting on the article, I'm glad you found it interesting.

DTR005: I happen to teach at a Norwegian school, and my students have told me they barely have problems understanding Danish people, yet they stick to the idea that it's a completely different language. However, I myself have read Danish websites thinking that it was Norwegian I was reading! I'm not an expert, but I agree that the distinction may have to do with national identity matters, which would be the consequence of missunderstanding what a dialect is. In Spain we have the same circumstance with Valencian and Catalan: from a strictly linguistic point of view, most linguists agree that they are two dialects of the same language. However, people don't like the word 'dialect', because they think it is somehow 'less important' than a language; therefore, people in Valencia proudly defend their notion of Valencià being a language itself, never a Catalan dialect. This doesn't make sense within the realm of linguistics as a scientific discipline, though sociolinguists will probably have a lot to say about it. Back to the Spanish/Italian mutual understandability, I don't think anyone within linguistics would doubt of them being two different languages; likewise, the idea that American Spanish and European Spanish are variants of one and the same language won't find much opposition.

Thanks for the comment!

lone77star profile image

lone77star Level 6 Commenter 15 months ago

Muy bien! I love history and I have loved learning at least a little Spanish. A very informative and interesting article. Thanks!

The Chinese "language" is an odd mix. In many discussions it seems that all of its "dialects" are treated as part of one language. I had the opportunity once to ask a visiting professor from China (who knew 5 "dialects") to say a sentence in English and then translate it into the 5 dialects. Not one of them sounded alike. Not a rigorous, scientific test, but it made me wonder if linguists had been a bit lazy declaring all of those Chinese languages as dialects of one huge language. I can't see how those "dialects" would have been mutually intelligible to their native speakers.

It is interesting, living here in the Philippines for 3 years, that some Cebuano is understandable because of borrowed words from Spanish.

Decosigner profile image

Decosigner 15 months ago

Hola Victor! I am from Philippines. Great hub of yours. Spain have ruled our country from as early as 1521 until 1898, that's 377 years. Spanish have been part of our language since then, in fact it was one of the subjects in school until later decades. Interestingly, some of our local dialects have words borrowed from Spanish and some people didn't even know it. I think, if Spain have ruled this country longer we would also have different version of it.

My father can write and speak Spanish, now I am struggling to learn it.

Víctor Manteiga profile image

Víctor Manteiga Hub Author 15 months ago

@lone77star: Thanks a lot, I'm glad you found it interesting. I don't know much about Chinese, I just remember having read that it is mainly a monosyllabic word based language whose semantics relies heavily on prosody. Apparently, different tones for the same monosyllabic word provide different meanings, so the word 'gou', for instance, pronounced with a raising intonation might mean 'dog', but something completely different if pronounced with another intonation pattern. Different dialects with different accents will vary these prosodic features so people speaking different dialects might not understand each other. Interestingly, the written standard, lacking such prosodic differences, can be understood throughout the whole Chinese linguistic community! Some Chinese expert out there who can put some light on the matter?

@Decosigner: as you say, the Spanish Empire extended as far as the Philippines over those centuries, and Spanish was an official language until not so long ago. It's very name derives from the King of Spain Felipe II! Apparently, the Spanish spoken in Philippines was closer to Mexican Spanish than European Spanish, because the country was under the rule of New Spain's viceroyalty, although the tendency today seems to be studying Spanish from Spain. I've always found weird -but fun- how Filipinos suddenly say words in Spanish perfectly pronounced when they speak. Thanks a lot for the comment and welcome to Hub Pages! ;)

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working